
(...or, "towards a Western Zen paradigm.")
I've always had this strange sense of "inner company"-- as though my heart held within it two very oddly matched characters, one in the person of a very short zen- master- esque Japanese man, fairly long past middle age, and the other, this quite flamboyant, mouthy redhead eager to get on with the party. They like each other, s'far as I can tell, as they have since I first noticed them a number of years ago. Neither of them are "me" so to speak; I'm not nearly careful enough to be much like "Dojo-sama", and the redhead makes me blush. But they seem to sum up something within me quite nicely, in some symbolic way. Great characters in a story with a plot that I'm still searching for!
So on with the story, then.
Dogen Zenji, 13th century Zen monk made famous by his collection of Buddhist teachings, Shobogenzo, would say to students who realized his point of practice: "You have got my marrow." I've been doing a lot of Shobogenzo study these days, in an effort to connect a little more deeply with the founder of my Soto lineage. But it's ironic, I think, to spend so much time in study with another's spiritual orientation when I've quite lost sight of my own.
So, today-- with the cold firmly outside my front door, hot chocolate in my belly and the kid happily in a nap, I'll make that attempt to write my marrow.
Zen isn't really my worry. I began my sitting practice 18 years ago and have come a long way in understanding that there is nothing to understand in zen; instead, it is a matter of direct experience with reality-- and not the one propelled by my imagination. Even childbirth is easier than zazen, which is simply the practice of sitting (...though I'll admit the former is much more painful). How is it, just to sit? To experience zazen for itself, which is to say meditation, without any thought derailing you from that direct experience? It's freaking hard. And I love it.
A long time ago, I asked a little question: What is the nature of this world? And back flowed the answer: Magic! Oh, and such amazing magic, too. In the years that followed, I discovered an innate comfort and ability to plug in, ask, direct and affect change. It was brilliant; I had no idea this world was so...malleable.
But, it got boring.
Not that I advanced to any high levels of magick or however you would want to say it. Rather, I saw that one could go on and on and on like this, ad infinitum. Sort of like that scene in Sleeping Beauty, where the 3 fairy godmothers can't agree on the color of Briar Rose's dress-- and so they fight and as she's dancing, the princess turns and turns between 3 different colors. On and on and on we go, and no matter what spell is cast or incantation chanted, there's still suffering, heartache, the whole lot of human existence.
So, I asked a second question: What is the nature of magic?
And on that day, a copy of Alan Watts' Way of Zen landed at my feet-- literally, as it had fallen from a shelf in the used bookstore where I worked at school. And so back to the first paragraph: with nothing to achieve but seeing my mind and thoughts within for what it really is, I let go and let the gown turn from pink to blue to green again-- no worries.
So then, what the heck am I doing here? Wasn't I "done" with magic? A Zen teacher asked me once-- why was I wasting my time with the "heathen" gods of our redneck ancestors, when Shiva is so much more interesting? Ah, me. I didn't have the heart to tell him how closely related those gods actually may be...
Yet it seems I have asked another question of this lovely existence, and perhaps that was, What is the nature of Zen? As Master Dogen describes it, it is the myriad of things, of all existence, reaching a state of realization through you. And to get to a place where I can really experience that? For me, this involves a careful, inner study of relationship. For who are we but our relationships? Not just in those quiet moments of zazen, but when all of life raises a collective hand and says, "look at me!!" as I relate to mother, friend, sibling, journalist, blogger...and déithe.
Who are the déithe?
I am somewhat relieved to see in other friends' posts that this is one of those healthy questions that keeps one's faith alive and engaged-- I've seen it in beginner's notebooks, as well as in the works of those who have been practicing polytheism for a long time. It's an answerless question, and like a koan if you think you know the answer, well then... you clearly are thinking too much!
For the answer doesn't rely on thought, does it? They are who they are, and what they are, and their existence goes on and on, no matter what we think they might be. The irony here is that we cannot know them without asking the question, and not-getting-an-answer.
I wrote to another friend who is asking a similar question these days that I had such a powerful, unshakable interaction with Brigid once, and since then the question has been foremost in my mind: Who are the déithe? And what is our relationship? What is the proper way to relate, what is the proper way to understand? I'm chewing on this and experimenting with relating, hoping to find an answer where somehow I understand, there is none really to be found...
I read a post that one person understood them to be nature incarnate; I suppose that understanding is most relevant to my own, unorganized though mine may be at the moment. But it's even more than that. When I see it in my mind-- I'm a more visual person-- my sense is of a deep well, no root, spiraling very deep down & down & down, into the earth and into every single ancestor. It's frightening, how much history this world holds, and every "world"; powerful and unimaginable. And here I am, hugging the tree so to speak, hoping to come to know it.
That is what I think of when I think of Brigid: the ancestry of this Earth that involves every cell in my body, and how it relates to the Earth and Sea and Sky-- the realms we can see and have an intimate familiarity with, and those we cannot ever hope to truly know, for their knowing is for eyes beyond the ones we carry in our heads. And yet, we are not separate; we are totally related, connected, and without a doubt in my mind, inseparable. As the Zen saying goes, "not one, not two".
Does honoring the déithe conflict at all with my practice as a Zen priest?
I think that rather sounds similar to, "does calling your parents conflict at all with your practice as a Zen priest?" (Er, that may be a bad example, for a phone conversation of any length with either of those folks often leads me to breaking one precept or other...) No, Zen is like a very big cup that can hold all the tea in the world without spilling it. If I were to get the big idea that I need to achieve godhood, well, that would be problematic, sure. But then I'll bet that's problematic according to the practices of honoring those gods, isn't it?
Naw. To me, the surest route to understanding who I am and where I am from involves the déithe for the simple fact that (big inhalation...) these are the heart-heros of my grandmother's grandmother's grandmother's and all my grandmothers into that great stream of an umbilical cord into history, which would be into Eire, and by my experience, down a well and into the sweet Earth itself. And I don't know nearly enough about my grandmother, or her mother, or the one before her, or the one who brought her into life, and the one before that, and so on; and so I ask, who are the déithe?
I wish, though, that I had a daily practice of it. I read of other friends living far-away who say things like, "oh I include that in my daily devotionals..." erp. My daily devotional involves a coffee mug, grouching at my husband and shuffling through a cold house trying to find a sunny spot so I can check the latest on the internet.
So I am learning, learning the proper way to balance fire and water, to say thank you, and please; and learning, one hopes, to find time to include all of that on a regular basis.
Who are the déithe?
Who is asking?
...that rather sums it up :)